from that perspective I can see why they're cross paying that much for LR (and probably also not exploiting LR to its fullest!).
Using dxo photolab with lightroom how to#
I know a few professionals who hate Adobe, yet they only use LR, don't take advantage of Portfolio nor do they know how to use PS (or what it can do for them). I've said it before, the actual price of the Adobe plan for this, LR and PS is actually very reasonable and affordable in the grand scheme of things, you just have to make sure you're squeezing every last drop out of the product. I also get this from my subscription Eddy Summers (Adobe Portfolio, free with the Adobe subscription) which in turn gets me more paid work and I have as of yet not needed to actually buy a website. If other free open software (or even reasonably priced cheaper ones) were to support synchronisation (and implemented well) as well as the same industry preset, LUT and plugin support entities. This is the area that LR (and to a degree PS) has all the power. LR has syncing which greatly improves the speed of workflow as well as being supported by various 3rd party industry preset, LUT and Plugins. model.Yeah, I mean I too am a fan of Linux and other free RAW editors (RawTherapee gets a fair amount of use for example), but for the professional (and I mean that, like as in event togs that do weddings and such), using such software is just unrealistic for big jobs. I can't imagine a situation where I'd return to the Microsoft/Adobe/etc. I even build my favorite RAW editor from source code so it's specifically tailored and optimized for my particular hardware.
I get a full office suite, operating system, two RAW editors, lens correction database, a pixel-level editor, panorama stitching application, video editor, and photo downloading utility for $0/month.
0 kommentar(er)
