srakause.blogg.se

Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017
Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017












sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017
  1. Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 upgrade#
  2. Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 download#
  3. Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 windows#

Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 windows#

In Synergy 1, for a brief time (between around 1.6 and 1.9) you could just about drag and drop files between your Windows and Mac computers. So, we'll likely implement it around the same time as when we rewrite the implementation for file drag and drop. Fun fact: The implementation is actually more closely related to the file drag and drop feature and really doesn't share much in common with the clipboard sharing feature as you might think. Seems like common sense to include this feature. clipboard sharing), you actually can't right click a file and copy the actual file. While you can indeed copy the contents of a file between your computers in Synergy right now (i.e. And worst case: you need to click once, on only one of your computers and it's all updated for you (also in the background). Therefore, best case: you don't need to do anything at all (it's all automatic and in the background).

Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 upgrade#

What would be great, is if you could either automatically (when the computer is idle) or manually click once to trigger the upgrade of all computers simultaneously.

Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 download#

Auto-UpdateĪ major pain point for our users is updating to update, you have to download and run the installer on three or more different computers, and sometimes you even have to reconnect a mouse and keyboard to all computers. Whether the computer is on an air-gapped military base, used in primary industry, or part of a test environment (like at anti-virus companies), sometimes Synergy simply needs to be configured offline. Additionally, there are real use cases where a computer can't access the web. Nonetheless, it's your data, so it's your choice. Don't worry, only your IP address is used for the handshake and anything you type stays absolutely private and is never shared with us. There are also people that don't want to use the Cloud because of privacy concerns. It turns out that many of our users were unable to use the new cloud-based auto-config service in Synergy 2. It is possible to switch between Xorg/X11 and Wayland on most Linux distros, but since Wayland is the way forward and Xorg/X11 is being phased out, we are committed to adding official Wayland support. There's a new Linux display manager that is set to replace Xorg/X11, which has been the defacto Linux desktop manager for as long as we can remember! Wayland is very similar to Xorg/X11, in terms of the API, but sadly is incompatible with Synergy. You'll be able to configure everything that you can in Synergy 1, and more. What about advanced users who want to, for example, choose which network adapter they want Synergy to use? In the next major version, we'll be adding a settings screen where advanced power users will be able to poke around under the hood. In Synergy 2, we removed advanced config in an effort to simplify the configuration, but actually we made it too simple. If there's something that excites you here or if we didn't hit the mark, vote now and let us know, so we can prioritize it for you. You can also tell us what's missing from this roadmap. This is for you, the Synergy user, so you can see what's coming soon (and then hopefully tell us what you're most excited about!) In the next version, we're learning from our mistakes and putting UX first. This roadmap is a sneak peek at what's coming in the next major version of Synergy.














Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017